Last week, the nation’s largest health insurance company, UnitedHealth, confirmed it will pull out of the Obamacare exchange in Oklahoma and most other states. This is one more symptom of the failure of Obamacare. Oklahomans have opposed Obamacare from the very beginning, and most of our politicians claim to agree with their voters.

Yet some of these same politicians are now working to bring Pres. Obama’s Medicaid expansion to Oklahoma under the guise of “rebalancing.” The worst part of this plan is it would force the state’s poorest families into the failing insurance exchange.

Michael Cannon explained in Forbes what the UnitedHealth announcement means.

Last month, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, whose members are the largest players in the Exchanges, reported that Exchange enrollees are costlier than those with employer-based coverage, consuming on average 22% more care.

UnitedHealth generally didn’t have the lowest-cost premiums in the Exchanges. The fact that it still lost money provides further evidence of significant adverse selection. It suggests high-cost patients are shopping for the most comprehensive benefits, regardless of premium; that UnitedHealth offered coverage that was attractive to the sick; and the company thus attracted a particularly costly group of enrollees.

OCPA has called repeatedly for Medicaid reforms that would control costs while ensuring the most vulnerable receive quality care. Instead of pursuing such reforms, bureaucrats at the Oklahoma Health Care Authority have spent years finding ways to increase their power and grow their budgets. That is what most bureaucracies do. It is surprising, however, that some legislators seem willing to violate campaign promises and make a short-term compromise that would throw the most vulnerable into a failing system. That is a measure of a far more serious kind of failure.