Search Results
Team Members
Showing 81 to 100 of 567 article results for “supreme court”
-
Health Care
A look at work-comp loss costs
Oklahoma’s work-comp reforms were having their intended results.Curtis Shelton | September 17, 2024
-
Education
U.S. Supreme Court should take Oklahoma charter-school case
In the St. Isidore case, the Oklahoma Supreme Court got it wrong and effectively discriminated against charter-school proponents because of religion. All Oklahomans would benefit if the U.S. Supreme Court took up the case.Jonathan Small | September 16, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court owes citizens written opinions
Oklahoma Supreme Court justices, because they are bound to decide according to the law, must explain the legal basis of their decisions. Inexplicably, Oklahoma’s justices often refuse to do so.Ryan Haynie | September 16, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Pattern notable in Oklahoma Supreme Court’s ever-shifting decisions
Whenever an initiative petition would grow government, the Oklahoma Supreme Court has held the “gist” statement is legally sound. When an initiative petition would rein in government, the court has nitpicked a gist to death to declare it illegal.Ray Carter | September 16, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has lost its way
If Oklahoma wants to be a state where the rule of law means something, the Oklahoma Supreme Court needs to confine itself to interpreting the law—not making it.Ryan Haynie | September 12, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma’s legal climate harms economic growth, job creation
Questionable rulings by Oklahoma judges have harmed Oklahoma’s economic competitiveness, according to a report from the State Chamber Research Foundation.Ray Carter | September 11, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
The Oklahoma Supreme Court or Oklahoma law: one is absurd
Judicial overreach by the Oklahoma Supreme Court threatens the separation of powers that is the foundation of the American political system.Ryan Haynie | September 11, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
In Arkansas, conservative Supreme Court makes major difference
The Arkansas Supreme Court now has a conservative majority that adheres to the law and the constitution rather than legislating from the bench. This has already had a real-world impact when it comes to addressing major state challenges.Ray Carter | September 9, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court confuses issues to achieve its favored result
Several decisions of the Oklahoma Supreme Court are not only bad as a matter of policy, but also are bad as a matter of law. Many of the justices are simply not skilled at judging.Ryan Haynie | September 9, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court’s creativity reduces legal certainty
The Oklahoma Supreme Court’s creative thinking leaves Oklahoma businesses and citizens without legal certainty.Jonathan Small | September 9, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court has been dismantling work-comp reform
The Oklahoma Legislature enacted comprehensive workers’ compensation reform, but the Oklahoma Supreme Court has been rolling it back.Curtis Shelton | September 6, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Liberal activists target state Supreme Court races
Liberal activists are targeting state Supreme Court races across the country, but not in Oklahoma. Why? Perhaps because the Oklahoma Supreme Court has already been rated one of the nation’s most liberal.Ray Carter | September 4, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court legislates on abortion
After the Dobbs decision, abortion advocates asked state courts to exercise raw judicial power. Unsurprisingly, those advocates found an ally in the Oklahoma Supreme Court.Ryan Haynie | September 3, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Democrat judges defy Oklahoma’s GOP trend
Oklahomans may be surprised to learn that nearly half the members of the Oklahoma Supreme Court were appointed by Democrat governors.Ray Carter | September 3, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court finds (yet another) way to make policy
Oklahoma has a state legislature. It passes laws. This is foundational to representative government and based in popular sovereignty. But often the Oklahoma Supreme Court doesn’t like it.Ryan Haynie | August 15, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court rewrites an insurance contract
Many Oklahoma Supreme Court justices have an uncanny ability to find ambiguity in statutes and contracts where none exists. They consistently employ this special power to expand legal liability and assist plaintiffs in their quest for damages.Ryan Haynie | August 7, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court justices are legislating from the bench
The Oklahoma Supreme Court controls dictionary definitions with the untethered freedom of a fiction writer—and does so after a law has been passed. That effectively makes the Court both the legislative and judicial branch in one entity.Jonathan Small | August 5, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Another example of the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s problematic use of the ‘special law’ provision
We’re starting to see a pattern here: The prohibition on special laws is frequently used by the Oklahoma Supreme Court to strike down laws it deems politically unpalatable.Ryan Haynie | August 1, 2024
-
Law & Principles
Despite its precedent, Oklahoma Supreme Court allows minimum-wage initiative to proceed
Once again, it seems that the Oklahoma Supreme Court ignored its own precedent in order to reach a policy conclusion it preferred—without giving the public a good explanation of why. Are you seeing a pattern yet?Ryan Haynie | July 24, 2024
-
Judicial Reform
Oklahoma Supreme Court errs on religious school decision
For too long, activist judges have falsely claimed a ban on state favoritism of religion requires active state opposition to religious entities. Sadly, it appears a majority of Oklahoma Supreme Court justices have adopted that stance.Jonathan Small | July 22, 2024